CO129-508-5 Supreme Court of Hong Kong- slackness of registry accounting methods 28-10-1927 - 23-4-1928 — Page 98

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All

A:29

9:30

A:30

0:31

A:31

0:32

A:32

0:33

4:33

0:34

A:34

0:35

No.

98

Has it always been the practice to employ only one firm of auctioneers?

In bankruptcy we always employed Lammert till their crash. Generally speaking it was always the practice to employ only one firm.

Why was this done?

It was more convenient. There is no official appointment. An order is signed in each case directing the auctioneer to sell.

What demands have you made for payment of the sums which the A. & B. Co., Ltd. have failed to pay in?

I have made no written application but have seen the Company representatives several times. I have got (produced) a written acknowledgment, signed by Hodge, amitting liability for not less then $25,000 in respect of auction sales conducted by the Company under order of the Court with an authority to deduct the amount from such of the proceeds of the sale of s.s. "Ling Nam" as may be payable to the Co.

Were the Judges or either of them aware that complaints had been made as to delay in paying out on distraints?

to me.

I am not sure. Mr. Wood may have mentioned it

When the "Record" book was produced to you did

you notice that from the beginning of 1926 there was

frequently a lapse of three months between sale and

rendition of account?

No.

In what form were proceeds of sales received

from auctioneers?

A:35

0:36

By cheques as a rule.

To whom made payable?

6.

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.